Cases 61 - 70 of 200
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MATA
as 2:2019cv12740
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EGAL MATA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. PFM BUSINESS VENTURES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01415
Defendant:
RALPH FENNER, PFM BUSINESS VENTURES LLC and GARY MCFADDEN
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. KAR HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv01414
Defendant:
KAR HOLDINGS, INC. and KATHLEEN ROSARIO
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. TRE RAGAZZI, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00039
Defendant:
ROMAN TIRACAVE, SALLY TIRACAVE and TRE RAGAZZI, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. FORUPK LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07970
Defendant:
FORUPK LLC and MICHAEL SOLL
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC v. LARKIN et al
as 2:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC
Defendant:
JOHN LARKIN and DINERBARNS, INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC et al
as 1:2018cv14283
Defendant:
ANTHONY DIDONATO and SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SHEHADEH et al
as 2:2018cv04119
Defendant:
FALON VELA, TAREK SHEHADEH, NADEEM SIDDIQUE and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv03333
Defendant:
SHARON MILLER, RLM INVESTMENTS, LLC, RUSSELL MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SHARPERSON et al
as 2:2018cv12388
Defendant:
MERVEL CORP. and ANTHONY SHARPERSON
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
