Cases 61 - 70 of 4,033
Robert
as 2:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
Lee Robert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kichman, Jr. v. Kramer-Scott et al
as 1:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
John W. Kichman, Jr.
Defendant:
Patty Kramer-Scott, Ethan David Kell, Travis Shenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Robey
as 5:2023cv03730
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee
Defendant:
Shawn Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 5:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA and John/Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PICONE v. USA
as 2:2023cv01681
Petitioner:
ADAM ROBERT LEE PICONE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 2:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LEE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2023cv03605
Plaintiff:
BARBARA LEE
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LEWIS v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
Tanasia Lewis
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., James Lee Sturgis, LYFT, INC. formerly known as BOUNDER WEB, INC. formerly known as ZIMRIDE, INC. also known as BOUNDER WEB, INC. also known as ZIMRIDE, INC. ALL COLLECTIVELY D/B/A LYFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LEWIS et al v. MOORE et al
as 2:2023cv03594
Defendant:
LEVI MOORE, MELISSA LEE, KEON MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL LEWIS and AMIRA LEWIS-DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
