Cases 61 - 70 of 333
MCDANIEL v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01674
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MICKESSON CORP.
Plaintiff:
GINGER MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDANIEL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02910
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
MCDANIEL and LATASHA MCDANIEL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rubin v. Levin et al
as 1:2020cv00299
Defendant:
Alan G. Spoon, Joseph M. Levin, Pamela S. Seymon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Nominal Defendant:
Match Group, Inc.
BAUM-BRUNNER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Defendant:
JUSTINE MCDANIEL, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER/CEO, CHRISTOPHER KOPECKI and others
Plaintiff:
BAUM-BRUNNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLING et al v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2020cv00271
Plaintiff:
NICOLE PORTNOY, NAKIA ROLLING, MARCUS MCDANIEL and others
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
as 2:2019cv06019
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RAPAK, SCOTT PECK, Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo and others
In Re:
WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. SemGroup Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Sarah M. Barpoulis, Ronald A. Ballschmiede, Carlin G. Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Lawrence
Walpole v. SemGroupn Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01957
Defendant:
Sarah M. Barpoulis, Ronald A. Ballschmiede, Carlin G. Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walpole
Thompson v. SemGroup Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Karl F. Furz, Sarah M. Barpoulis, Ronald A. Ballschmiede and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Cheng v. Total System Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01513
Defendant:
Connie D. McDaniel, Sidney E. Harris, Thaddeus Arroyo and others
Plaintiff:
Shao Cheng Cheng
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
