Cases 61 - 70 of 188
PARKER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Petitioner:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Respondent:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. BYNUM et al
as 2:2014cv07035
Plaintiff:
KER'RON JONES
Defendant:
BYNUM, LOUIS GIORLA , MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. WARDEN MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv06574
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
WARDEN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MICHELE FARREL, DERICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06573
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
MICHELE FARRELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06572
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
MICHELE FARRELL, ANGELO FOGLIETTA, ESQ, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL
as 2:2014cv06340
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY et al
as 2:2014cv06321
Petitioner:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Respondent:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PARKER
as 2:2014cv06158
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
JASON PARKER, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, JUDGE MEANS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALBERT v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06094
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, DEJESUS, K. PAONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
