Cases 61 - 70 of 72
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA et al v. MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2016mc00972
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRIBES OF AMERICA and NOON BEAR
Defendant:
MCKEESPORT POST OFFICE, SENTENCING DESIGNATION AND COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS and others
In Re: Frederick Bank
as 16-3933
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
In Re: Frederick Bank
as 16-3091
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
In re: Frederick H. Bank
as 16-2453
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
IN RE: Frederick H. Bank
as 15-3518
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK H. BANKS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Joseph Filbert
as 14-3546
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH R. FILBERT
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
In re: Clarence Hoffert
as 14-3321
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CLARENCE HOFFERT
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
MARK R. HORNAK
BANKS et al v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and RAFAEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MARK R. HORNAK, ERIC ROSEN, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Banks et al v. Hornak et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Rafael Cabrera
Defendant:
Mark R. Hornak, Eric Rosen, David Hicton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
