Cases 61 - 70 of 71
THOMPSON et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
GERALD THOMPSON, GERALD THOMPSON, ELLIOT ROSARIO and others
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC., US AIRWAYS, INC., US AIRWAYS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
NEWBORG et al v. US AIRWAYS et al
as 2:2008cv05826
Plaintiff:
JOHN NEWBORG and PEGGY NEWBORG
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC and PSA AIRLINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US AIRWAYS, INC. v. MCCUTCHEN et al
as 2:2008cv01593
Plaintiff:
US AIRWAYS, INC.
Defendant:
JAMES E. MCCUTCHEN and ROSEN, LOUIK & PERRY, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SILVERMAN et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC.
as 2:2008cv02062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SILVERMAN and BARRIE SILVERMAN
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cheryl Landis v. US Airways Inc, et al
as 08-1958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL LANDIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOEING CO and US AIRWAYS INC
SLOANE v. US AIRWAYS, INC.
as 2:2008cv01496
Plaintiff:
SUSAN DUITCH SLOANE
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BENNETT v. US AIRWAYS, INC.
as 2:2008cv01257
Plaintiff:
DAWN BENNETT
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
LANDIS v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01216
Plaintiff:
CHERYL LANDIS and CHERYL LANDIS
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, INC. and THE BOEING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PASSERINI et al v. US AIRWAYS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01042
Plaintiff:
JUDITH PASSERINI, JUDITH PASSERINI, JUDITH PASSERINI and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE MALE PASSENGER WHO SAT IN SEAT 3A ON US AIRWAYS FLIGHT 111 ON MAY 19, 2004 and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
