Cases 71 - 80 of 1,161
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUTCHINSON v. BERGEN COUNTY N.J. SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
DELANO HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY N.J. SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY CURETON, SHERIFF GRELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SACCHI v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
JOHN SACCHI
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KOVALEV v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., THE HOME DEPOT, INC., THE HOME DEPOT #4112 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedeno et al v. Burton et al
as 2:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
misty Cedeno, James Alexander and JAMES ALEXANDER, SR.
Defendant:
PO Christopher Burton, charles McCairns, P.O. Michael Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
OKTEN v. ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
NATALIE OKTEN
Defendant:
ARS NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 TO 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simmons v. Sprout Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Emily Simmons, Lynn Huntley, Salvatore Stile and others
Defendant:
SPROUT FOODS, INC., North Castle Partners and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
