Cases 71 - 80 of 105
DEC v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE-TROOP D et al
as 2:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE-TROOP D, TROOPER JENKINS, TROOPER MIFSOB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RABBITT v. WEINBERG et al
as 2:2011cv07573
Plaintiff:
ELAINE RABBITT
Defendant:
LORETTA WEINBERG and TIMOTHY DRISCOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRISCOLL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55392
Plaintiff:
GERARD D. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57408
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv46185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DRISCOLL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOLAND et al v. HESS et al
as 2:2011mc00226
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , JOHN FLYNN , HENRY KRAMER and others
Defendant:
STRUC-TITE RESTORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
DRISCOLL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41287
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv38253
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. CATALINA ISLAND STEAMSHIP CO.
as 2:2011cv38254
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
CATALINA ISLAND STEAMSHIP CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv83363
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE J. DRISCOLL and PATRICIA DRISCOLL
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. , THE CELOTEX CORP. , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
