Cases 71 - 80 of 271
HORTON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv03220
Plaintiff:
CHRIS HORTON , FRANCIS PEAY and JEFF STOVER
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HORTON v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
YVETTE M. HORTON
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hankins v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2012cv02554
Plaintiff:
Robert Hankins
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA, Kathline Kane, PA Board of Probation & Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JACKSON v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS WETZEL et al
as 3:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. JACKSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI HOUTZDALE STEVEN R. GLUNT, DAVID J. CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Saltalamacchia v. Wentzel et al
as 3:2012cv01902
Plaintiff:
Anthony Saltalamacchia
Defendant:
John Wentzel, Marirosa Lamas, Jeffrey Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISE v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL PARISE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, STEVEN GLUNT, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidmosko v. Lamas et al
as 1:2012cv01685
Plaintiff:
Allen Vidmosko
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas, Jeffrey Horton, Lackawanna County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HORTON v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv04118
Plaintiff:
JUDITH HILL HORTON
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
