Cases 71 - 80 of 98
ANDERSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
BRENDA J. ANDERSON , SUSAN CHANDLER , EDNA KEYS-CHAVIS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WINKLER et al v. ALLIED RECYCLING, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv04776
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WINKLER and JUDY WINKLER
Defendant:
ALLIED RECYCLING, INC., ROBERT J. ANDERSON, AL ELK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLURI v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2014cv04777
Plaintiff:
WAYNE FLURI
Defendant:
ROBERT J. ANDERSON, ALLIED RECYCLING, INC., AL ELK, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Misael Cordero v. Charles Warren, et al
as 14-2860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MISAEL CORDERO
Defendant:
CHARLES E. WARREN, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, sued in their individuaal and official capacities and SUZANNE LAWRENCE
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
In re: Michale Anderson
as 13-2850
Petitioner:
In re: MICHALE J. ANDERSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
GARDNER v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2013cv01303
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN GARDNER
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, CHARLES WARREN, VALISA LEONARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv04470
Plaintiff:
LIONELL G. MILLER
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, GREG BARTKOWSKI, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORDERO v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv02136
Plaintiff:
MISAEL CORDERO
Defendant:
CHARLES E. WARREN and WILLIAM J. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOMACK v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv01232
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. WOMACK
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, T. BEATTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
