Cases 71 - 80 of 107
BARTEE v. BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLAND et al
as 1:2012cv07053
Plaintiff:
MARK BARTEE
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLAND, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FLEM and JOHN DOE 1, 2, AND 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHIDLEY v. TULEJA et al
as 2:2012cv04615
Plaintiff:
COREY CHIDLEY
Defendant:
STEPHEN TULEJA , ABC, INC. and JOHN DOES (1-2)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYERS v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03660
Plaintiff:
VALERIE MYERS
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITEHEAD v. JONES et al
as 2:2012cv03662
Plaintiff:
RONELL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
DEMOSS JONES, L. PAPARO, BROCKWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KYAM v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv03284
Plaintiff:
TARIQ KIWAN KYAM
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MARQUIS CARTER, JOHN DOE #1 & #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGH v. MULTANI BROTHERS, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv02805
Plaintiff:
MANDEEP SINGH
Defendant:
MULTANI BROTHERS, LLC , MULTANI BROTHERS, INC. and JOHN DOES #1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
POMFRET v. ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2012cv00519
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POMFRET
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-2
Counter_claimant:
ATLANTIC CITY
Counter_defendant:
RICHARD POMFRET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2011cv06315
Plaintiff:
RONALD BENSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, Z. S. HUNT, R. M. CORREIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
