Cases 71 - 80 of 148
CANTU v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00293
Petitioner:
ARTURO CANTU
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VAN NGUYEN v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
DIEP VAN NGUYEN
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
QUINONES-PORTOCARRERO v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00235
Petitioner:
AURELIO QUINONES-PORTOCARRERO
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00233
Petitioner:
ANTHONY B. JONES
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WILLIAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 1:2013cv00219
Petitioner:
JODY L. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ADEYEMI v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00216
Petitioner:
SAMSON OLUMWSEUN ADEYEMI
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meeks et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03652
Plaintiff:
CHIEF ROBERT MOORE, John Nunan, Patricia Shadoan and others
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
In Re:
PLAVIX PRODUCT LIABILITY AND MARKETING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRUZ v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00149
Petitioner:
ROBERTO V. CRUZ
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIVERA-CRUZ v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00135
Petitioner:
RAMON RIVERA-CRUZ
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WOTHINGTON v. MEEKS
as 1:2013cv00123
Petitioner:
RENO WOTHINGTON
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
