Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Karl White v. G. Green, et al
as 09-4138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL E. WHITE, on his own behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
Karl White v. G. Green, et al
as 09-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL E. WHITE, on his own behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
WHITE v. GREEN et al
as 2:2009cv01219
Plaintiff:
KARL E. WHITE
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GREENE v. PIONEER GLASS, INC.
as 2:2008cv04300
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GREENE
Defendant:
PIONEER GLASS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spruill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2008cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert Spruill
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Catherine McVey, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALLACE v. GREEN et al
as 2:2008cv03239
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. WALLACE
Defendant:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, JAMES B. HALLIGAN, III. and VRAM NEDURIAN, JR
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Greene v. Michael Barrasse, et al
as 08-2753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREENE
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARRASSE, MARY ANNE GRIPPO, COREY KOCHARNO and others
Clifford Newman v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD T. NEWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Director of the Department of Correction, DIANE L. DOMBACH, Director of the Department of Correction and MICHAEL GREEN, Director of the Department of Correction
Greene v. Barrasse et al
as 3:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
Michael Barrasse, Maryann Grippo, Corey Kocharno and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Toland v. McVey et al
as 1:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
Christopher Toland
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, Michael Green, Jeffrey Imbaden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
