Cases 71 - 80 of 168
MCKINNEY v. RANKIN et al
as 2:2015cv06315
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
TUESDAY RANKIN and NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv01698
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, James C. Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. Global Tel-Link et al
as 3:2015cv01243
Plaintiff:
Terry McNeil
Defendant:
Global Tel-Link and Glenda Rankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00811
Plaintiff:
April M. Rankins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marylynn Hartsel, et al v. Vanguard Group Inc, et al
as 15-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARYLYNN HARTSEL and DEANNA PARKER, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendants Vanguard International Equity Index Funds d/b/a Vanguard European Stock Index Fund, and Vanguard Horizon Funds d/b/a Vanguard Global Equity Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
VANGUARD GROUP INC, JOHN J. BRENNAN, CHARLES D. ELLIS and others
RANKIN v. TARGET STORES et al
as 2:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
CALVIN RANKIN
Defendant:
TARGET STORES and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNTER v. RANKIN
as 1:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
JAMAR HUNTER
Defendant:
JANE RANKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Rankine v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 14-4338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANKINE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
House v. Fisher et al
as 1:2014cv01732
Plaintiff:
Juan House
Defendant:
John Fisher, Jay Whitesel, Lonnie Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPURELL v. CAMBELL et al
as 2:2014cv02757
Plaintiff:
LEWIS SPURELL
Defendant:
MIRA BAYLSON, EMILY DUST, JEFFREY NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
