Cases 71 - 80 of 215
Voneida v. Stoehr et al
as 1:2010cv02572
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Voneida
Defendant:
Kevin Stoehr, Graham Spanier, Gregory Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
ANDERSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2010cv01565
Petitioner:
THOMAS RAY ANDERSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, TOM CORBETT and MARK AARON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PISKANIN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00299
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JAMES B. MARTIN and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHAFFER v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00294
Petitioner:
PAUL LEN SCHAFFER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JEFFREY D. BURKETT and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDE v. SAUERS et al
as 5:2010cv06824
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN EDE
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, JAMES B. MARTIN, TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WAGMAN v. CHERBA et al
as 2:2010cv01496
Plaintiff:
PHILIP GARY WAGMAN
Defendant:
LAWRENCE CHERBA, LAWRENCE FUKSA, ANDREW DEMAREST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABERU v. FISHER et al
as 2:2010cv05515
Petitioner:
MARIO ABERU
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, TOM CORBETT and THE ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAVORS v. PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTION (DOC). et al
as 1:2010cv02123
Petitioner:
Percy Favors
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv05338
Petitioner:
ANDRE MARTIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PISKANIN v. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2010cv05259
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, REPUBLICAN PARTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, WILLIAM H. PLATT, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
