Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 738,533
Cephea Valve Technologies Inc Equityholders' Repre v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 24-1912
Plaintiff: CEPHEA VALVE TECHNOLOGIES INC EQUITYHOLDERS' REPRESENTATIVE, on behalf of the Cephea Valve Technologies, Inc. Participating Securityholders
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES and ABBOTT VASCULAR INC
In re: Rodrick Brayboy
as 24-1924
Petitioner: In re: RODRICK BRAYBOY
Respondent: MAHANOY SCI, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and others
USA v. Julius Postell
as 24-1909
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JULIUS POSTELL
In re: Michael Reynolds
as 24-1933
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff: JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant: HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Sony Music Entertainment et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff: Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Music Entertainment US Latin, LLC, Ultra Records, LLC and others
Defendant: Marriott International, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06204
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02143
Plaintiff: KERRY MCCALL
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrew Perrong v. Matthew Bradford, et al
as 24-1925
Plaintiff: ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant: MATTHEW BRADFORD and CLEO COMMUNICATIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?