Cases 81 - 90 of 1,549
MAMROUD et al v. STOLTE et al
as 3:2023cv22615
In Re:
MAMROUD
Petitioner:
JEFFREY MAMROUD
Respondent:
MAGISTRATE BARBARA STOLTE, BRIAN ENGLISH, MATTHEW PLATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reynolds v. Spruill et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
Jon Reynolds
Defendant:
Yancey Spruill, Warren Adelman, Amy Butte and others
Nominal Defendant:
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 23-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator
Defendant:
J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections, D. SMITH, KENNETH NELSON, Ex-Associate Administrator and others
CONTALDO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv22939
Plaintiff:
AMY CONTALDO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Singh et al v. FCA U.S. LLC
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Anshuman Singh, Theresa Clark, Jeremy Erskine and others
Defendant:
Stellantis N.V. and FCA U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. EQRx, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01179
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
EQRx, Inc., Alexis Borisy, Amy Abernethy and others
Welsh v. EQRx, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Kevin Welsh
Defendant:
EQRx, Inc., Alexis Borisy, Amy Abernethy and others
INGANDELA v COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22757
Plaintiff:
AMY INGANDELA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shah v. Narayen et al
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Shantanu Narayen, Amy Banse, Brett Biggs and others
Nominal Defendant:
Adobe Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
