Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Mikell v. Moore et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
Damien Mikell
Respondent:
Shirley R. Moore, Franklin J. Tennis, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Andrew Lipman, et al
as 11-1399
Petitioner:
MATTHEW FAISON, JR.
Respondent:
ANDREW LIPMAN, atty. for AT&T, JUSTIN HAYNES, Analyst for Big Bend telephone of Alpine Texas, JOHN WOODY, Vice-President for Mountain View WYO and others
PROFIC v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2011cv00928
Petitioner:
MARCUS R. PROFIC
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, S.C.I. MERCER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDANIELS v. THOMPSON
as 2:2010cv07536
Petitioner:
CRAIG KIP MCDANIELS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Darnell Williams v. Brian Thompson, et al
as 10-4585
Petitioner:
In re: DARNELL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, Superintendent SCI Mercer, DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2010cv05435
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL SIMMONS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., DANIEL O'MALLY, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv01543
Plaintiff:
John Carter
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard,, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Paul Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00851
Plaintiff:
Buster Hines
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, James A. Schildt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotto v. Tennis et al
as 3:2010cv00343
Plaintiff:
Luis Cotto
Defendant:
Frank Tennis, Robert Marsh, Brian Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
