Cases 81 - 90 of 257
COBB-LEAVY et al v. BOROUGH OF YEADON et al
as 2:2018cv01069
Plaintiff:
VANESSA COBB-LEAVY and DAVID LEAVY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF YEADON, PAUL MCGRENERA and DONALD J. MOLINEUX, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
KEITH B. COBB, SR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COBBS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10891
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA COBBS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRETT v. ANTHONY UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2017cv04204
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ANTHONY UNKNOWN, SALVATORE UNKNOWN, PAUL MARSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. BERRYHILL et al
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE COBB
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DOIDGE v. J COBB INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 1:2017cv05729
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOIDGE
Defendant:
J COBB INSURANCE GROUP and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Robert D. Mabe, Inc., et al. v. OPTUMRX
as 3:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Mabe, Inc. , Abington Pharmacy, Inc. , Jac Stores, Inc. and others
Defendant:
OPTUMRX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COBBS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv04447
Plaintiff:
DEBRA COBBS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
