Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Haworth v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2020cv01690
Defendant:
Geoffrey Baldwin, Parrish, Goodling and others
Plaintiff:
Abryon Haworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zaccone et al v. Haworth-Dodd et al
as 2:2020cv07452
Defendant:
United States Postal Service aka Postal Service, ABC CORP 1-10 (FICTICIOUS CORPORATE DEFENDANTS), Clifford C Haworth-Dodd and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon DiPalma-Zaccone and Robert Zaccone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
RUBEL et al v. BOROUGH OF HAWORTH/BOROUGH OF HAWORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv17254
Defendant:
OFFICER JUSTIN FOX, OFFICER GIANLUCA RAGONE, BOROUGH OF HAWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
DEANNA CARLIN and ERICK RUBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAWORTH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59493
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. HAWORTH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COLEMAN v. HAWORTH, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv03200
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE COLEMAN
Defendant:
HAWORTH, INC. , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , JOHN DOES I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAWORTH v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68766
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HAWORTH
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DISALVO v. BOROUGH OF HAWORTH
as 2:2008cv04768
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DISALVO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF HAWORTH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC. v. SPACECO, INC. et al
as 2:2005cv04037
Defendant:
SPACECO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC., SPACECO, INC. and HAWORTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE OFFICE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
