Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 23-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator
Defendant:
J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections, D. SMITH, KENNETH NELSON, Ex-Associate Administrator and others
Larry StrombergIn re: Larry Stromberg
as 21-1335
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY N. STROMBERG
STROMBERG v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv00731
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT SORBER
Petitioner:
LARRY STROMBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MINOR v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv03741
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS MINOR
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, TIMOTHY MAINES, CYNTHIA JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv03802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GLENN
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, GARY LANIGAN, ROBERT ROYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NEALS v. STROMBERG et al
as 3:2016cv07141
Plaintiff:
TIVON NEALS
Defendant:
FRANCINE STROMBERG , GARY LANIGAN , STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUCKETT v. BURAK et al
as 3:2015cv06392
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DUCKETT
Defendant:
MELANIE BURAK, FRANCINE STROMBERG, DANIEL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATERFORD v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2015cv05489
Plaintiff:
IRONE WATFORD
Defendant:
STEPHEN M. D'ILIO, FRANCINE STROMBERG and CHONG - HWA CHANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
