Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TRANSEL ELEVATOR & ELECTRIC, INC. v. CROWN ENERGY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02307
Plaintiff:
TRANSEL ELEVATOR & ELECTRIC, INC. doing business as T.E.I. GROUP
Defendant:
CROWN ENERGY SERVICES, INC. doing business as ABLE ENGINEERING SERVICES and ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BONDS v. ABM AVIATION, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv14078
Defendant:
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ABM AVIATION, INC. and JOHN DOE A TO Z
Plaintiff:
ANNIE L BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALNOKY v. ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES MID-ATLANTIC INC. et al
as 1:2020cv09186
Plaintiff:
PAUL B. DALNOKY
Defendant:
ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED and ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES MID-ATLANTIC INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
SHOOK v. GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. and ABM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SHOOK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
