Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 275
NGUYEN v. POLICE AND FIRE FEDERAL CREDIT et al
as 2:2024cv04121
Defendant: VANESSA LOPEZ, DOES 1 TO 10, INTERNATIONAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS and others
Plaintiff: CINDY NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NGUYEN v. R&L CARRIERS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03629
Defendant: JOHN DOE and R&L CARRIERS, INC.
Plaintiff: SIMON NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CAPUTO et al v. CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
as 1:2024cv07723
Plaintiff: TIFFANY HOFFMAN, CHRISTINA MORALES, MARK BARBER and others
Defendant: CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
Flinn v. Lawless et al
as 2:2024cv02706
Defendant: Edward Lawless and David Nguyen
Plaintiff: Justin Flinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NGUYEN v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02643
Plaintiff: Administrator WILLIAM H NGUYEN
Defendant: CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00969
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Christopher Nguyen v. District Attorney Berks County, et al
as 24-1582
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Masel v. The Chemours Company et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff: Todd Masel
Defendant: The Chemours Company, Mark E. Newman, Sameer Ralhan and others
Petitioner: Cindy Nguyen
Chan v. Jagdfeld et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff: Joe Chan
Defendant: Aaron Jagdfeld, Marcia J. Avedon, John D. Bowlin and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?