Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bill Williams v. City of Allentown, et al
as 19-1444
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, GLEN DORNEY and GAIL STRUSS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH MORRIS and ED PAWLOWSKI
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2017cv04910
Plaintiff:
BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN , KEITH MORRIS , ED PAWLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
WILLIAMS v. MARRIOTT HOTEL et al
as 2:2017cv02263
Plaintiff:
BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARRIOTT HOTEL and STARBUCKS CAFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. THE COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2014cv05091
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF BERKS, PENNSYLVANIA, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF BERKS COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv64995
Plaintiff:
BILL WILLIAMS and ELSIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION , GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION , ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv84293
Plaintiff:
BILL WILLIAMS, BILL WILLIAMS, ELSIE MARIE WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STOKES v. WILLIAMS
as 5:2008cv05799
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWIN STOKES, JR.
Defendant:
BILL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SULLIVAN et al v. WILLARD et al
as 2:2007cv66140
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. SULLIVAN, CYNTHIA SULLIVAN, GILBERT THOMAS, JR. and others
Defendant:
PAUL W. WILLARD, A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
