Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BREI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BREI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK, TIMOTHY FULLERTON, D.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
BREI v. FULLERTON et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
SANDRA BREI
Defendant:
TIMOTHY FULLERTON , PRIMARY HEALTH NETWORK and DIANA KEISEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Rachel White v. Camden Board of Education, et al
as 12-3743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMDEN BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
CAMDENS LAWYER, BREY and WILKINS
Rachel White v. Camden Board of Education
as 12-1387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMDEN BOARD OF EDUCATION, CAMDEN'S LAWYER, BREY and others
WHITE v. CAMDEN BOARD OF ED. et al
as 2:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
RACHEL WHITE
Defendant:
CAMDEN BOARD OF ED., CAMDEN'S LAWYER, BREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREY-FORD v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2010cv02923
Plaintiff:
RANDALL BREY-FORD
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BREY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv79941
Plaintiff:
KELLY G. BREY, KELLY G. BREY, NANCY BREY and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BREI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2009cv00931
Plaintiff:
SANDRA L. BREI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BREY v. ANCHOR PACKING CO et al
as 2:2009cv61077
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A BREY, SR.
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO, ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
