Cases 1 - 9 of 9
The Weinstein Co Holdings
as 20-1751
Defendant / Appellee:
SPYGLASS MEDIA GROUP LLC, FKA Lantern Entertainment LLC
Debtor:
In re: WEINSTEIN CO HOLDINGS LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE COHEN PRODUCTIONS and BRUCE COHEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00242
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00243
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MILLARD v. CSL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv05093
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MILLARD
Defendant:
CSL SERVICES, INC. and BRUCE COHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALLEN et al v. COHEN et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY ALLEN and ONEIL J. ALLEN
Defendant:
CRAIG M. COHEN and BRUCE COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cyrus Sanders v. County of Bradford, et al
as 15-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYRUS R. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BRADFORD, DANIEL J. BARRETT, Bradford County District Attorney, OFFICERS UNKNOWN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Cyrus Sanders v. County of Bradford, et al
as 13-4229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYRUS R. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BRADFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JAMES VANNESS, PRIVATE ACTORS*
Sanders v. County of Bradford et al
as 3:2011cv01723
Plaintiff:
Cyrus R Sanders
Defendant:
County of Bradford, Daniel Barrett, Officers Unknown, Montgomery County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERVENEN et al v. EMPIRECLS WORLDWIDE CHAFFERED SERVICES et al
as 2:2010cv03743
Plaintiff:
ILKER SERVENEN , YASSER ELDASOUKY , FAISAL ABEDRABBO and others
Defendant:
EMPIRECLS WORLDWIDE CHAFFERED SERVICES, DAVID SEELINGER, EDWARD MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
