Cases 1 - 10 of 49
MIMS v. GRAY et al
as 2:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
HAABIYL MIMS
Defendant:
VICE ADMIRAL CHRISTOPHER S. GRAY, CARLOS DEL TORO, CAPTAIN JOSEPH DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04856
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON THOMAS and MUSTAFA C. THOMAS
Defendant:
PAUL WORRELL, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES GIST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YACKAMOVICH v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2017cv04085
Plaintiff:
DANIEL G. YACKAMOVICH
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, PRIVOTT and WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv04153
Plaintiff:
JERRY GLENN
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, ADRIAN HAREWOOD, SHIFT COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03630
Plaintiff:
RODNEY GREEN
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. , CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC , MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. WEINER et al
as 2:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WEINER, SUPERINTENDENT JOHN C. THOMAS, MS. SHIRLEY LAWSMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. HAMMOND et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DOUGLAS LITTLE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. HAMMOND , 37TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA , EVA C. STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv02187
Plaintiff:
JEROME WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS and MENTAL HEALTH PRACTITIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2016cv01493
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RIVERA
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS , BOBBY ZANKEL , PETER ABHULIMEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLAH v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2015cv05593
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
Defendant:
JOHN C. THOMAS, SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, LOUISA PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
