Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WAGNER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C. WAGNER, andre araujo and STEPHEN WAGNER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, a&m curran llc and THOMAS CURRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PULLIAM v. WAGNER
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
LATASHA PULLIAM
Defendant:
SHAWN C. WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Armolt v. Kerestes et al
as 1:2015cv01642
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Armolt
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Shawn C. Wagner and Kathleen Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schroll v. Wagner
as 3:2013cv01431
Petitioner:
David Clarence Schroll
Respondent:
Shawn C. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.069 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-2F-0019 et al
as 2:2009cv01064
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.069 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-2F-0019, CATHLENE C. WAGNER, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wagner v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2008cv01861
Plaintiff:
Debbie C. Wagner
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut v. Connolly et al
as 3:2007cv02253
Plaintiff:
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut
Defendant:
Vincent Connolly, Frank Archer and Evelyn C. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WAGNER et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv61454
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C WAGNER, CHARLES C WAGNER, CHARLES C WAGNER and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
