Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 17-2631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
Demetrius Bailey v. Melissa McMahon, et al
as 16-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA MCMAHON, T. GIMBENSKI, DORINA VARNER and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
ANGELA AUGMAN and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Hallman v. Robert Stitt, et al
as 15-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT HALLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT STITT
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND LAWLER, MAJOR WAKEFIELD and others
Williams v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01338
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, John Wetzel, John Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
