Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Palani Karupaiyan v. , et alIn re: Palani Karupaiyan v. , et al
as 23-2878
Petitioner: In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff: P. P., R. P. and SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Respondent: JUDGE SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE L. NAGANANDA, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE NAGA LAW FIRM, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ and others
CORSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18213
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN P. CORSON and THE ESTATE OF SARA W. CORSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CORSON v. POPS BAGEL SHOP LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04005
Plaintiff: LISA CORSON
Defendant: POPS BAGEL SHOP LLC, HAYTHAM MUHEISEN, OWNER.COM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 23-1788
Defendant / Appellee: In re: JUSTICE LEE A. SOLOMON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ, SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, individually and in his official capacity as owner of Naga Law Firm and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Plaintiff / Appellee: SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Debtor / Appellee: OAK TREE VILLAGE and EDISON TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00886
Plaintiff: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P P. and others
Defendant: SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P. P. and others
Defendant: SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BEST v. MARCUS O. HICKS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06911
Plaintiff: JOHN BEST
Defendant: FORMER COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MARCUS O. HICKS, in his official and individual capacities, FORMER ADMINISTRATOR of SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON JOHN POWELL, in his official and individual capacities, ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR & CURRENT ADMINISTRATOR of SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON KEISHA FISHER, in her official and individual capacities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUVEL et al v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv06449
Plaintiff: LYNDA BUVEL, JOY M CORSON, DAN KALIE and others
Defendant: BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee: P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee: L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant: JUDGE BARRY T. ALBIN, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE CRAIG CORSON, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
FONTANEZ v. KUHN et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03046
Plaintiff: ANTHONY FONTANEZ
Defendant: COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN, AL SOLANIK, ANTHONY DEGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?