Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CARTAGENA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 3:2024cv04481
Plaintiff:
HECTOR CARTEGENA and HECTOR CARTAGENA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
NUNES-CARTAGENA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09611
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA NUNES-CARTAGENA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTAGENA-GONZALEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2020cv20185
Plaintiff:
TOMAS CARTAGENA-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SPINA v. CARTAGENA et al
as 2:2017cv01210
Plaintiff:
SCOTT V SPINA, JR
Defendant:
JOSEPH CARTAGENA, ALL THE WAY UP LLC, UP NYC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTAGENA v. MORGAN AND MORGAN, P.C. d/b/a MORGAN BORNSTEIN & MORGAN
as 1:2016cv09318
Plaintiff:
BOBBY CARTAGENA
Defendant:
MORGAN AND MORGAN, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv08532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CARTAGENA v. ALLIED DENTAL CORPORATION
as 3:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY CARTAGENA
Defendant:
ALLIED DENTAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
AZIZ v. CARTAGENA et al
as 2:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
AHMED ABD EL AZIZ
Defendant:
R. CARTAGENA, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-10, THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
