Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Charles Jones v. Jerry Hobeck, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, Police Officer, JUDITH P. PETRUSH, District Attorney and FRANK PALLONE, JR., Magisterial District Judge
JONES v. NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
NEW KENSINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BEN R. MICHAELS and JERRY M. HOBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
CHARLES D. JONES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, NICOLE W. ZICCARELLI and STEVEN PELESKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Records et al
as 1:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, III
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Mike Records, Matthew Dutton, Thelma Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. HOBECK et al
as 2:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, ESQUIRE JUDITH POTOKA PETRUSH and FRANK J PALLONE JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United Specialty Insurance Company v. JB Trans et al
as 4:2021cv02092
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
JB Trans, Jaswant Singh, James R. Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Charles Jones v. Peggy Baughman
as 19-3456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN and MUHAMMAD NAJI
JONES v. BAUGHMAN et al
as 3:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. JONES
Defendant:
PEGGY BAUGHMAN, KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yun v. Lowe et al
as 3:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Brien Lowe, Anthony J. Alexander and Charles E. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59196
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
