Cases 1 - 10 of 10
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON, JR. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv06583
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL CURTIS JOHNSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2014cv03099
Petitioner:
James Curtis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRISTER et al v. NATOINAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03693
Plaintiff:
WALTER BRISTER , BONNIE BRISTER , PAUL R. TRIPOLI and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58393
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
USA v. Curtis Johnson
as 09-1783
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS JOHNSON
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83776
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JOHNSON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65021
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JOHNSON and CURTIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
