Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Myers v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Rayti Myers
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Miranda Brechbiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Heist et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Tonya Heist, Laurel Harry, Jen Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius Bailey v. Jen Digby, et al
as 22-3118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JEN DIGBY, Unit Manager at SCI-Camp Hill, SGT. MULL, Sergeant on N-Block, SGT. GREEN, Sergeant on N-Block and others
Walker v. Digby
as 3:2022cv00839
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Jen Digby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Molina v. Laural Harry, et al
as 21-3374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURAL R. HARRY, DIGBY, SCOTT WHALEN and others
DRUMGO V. FUNK, et al.
as 3:2020cv01829
Defendant:
SGT Bare, C/O McBeth, Sgt. Ritchey and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Drumgo, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRUMGO V. FUNK, et al.
as 2:2020cv04706
Defendant:
SGT BARE, C.O. CLINE, (HEX) SCHNEK and others
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN DRUMGO, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drumgo v. Funk et al
as 3:2020cv01643
Defendant:
Deb Alvord, C.O. Roth, SGT McBeth and others
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Drumgo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Digby et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Jen Digby, Howdy Shell, Jody Fognani and others
Plaintiff:
William Walker, Cameron Lovett, Dwayne Gooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIGBY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv10054
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA DIGBY
In Re:
PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
