Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
KREIDER v. COATES
as 5:2023cv03522
Plaintiff:
LORI KREIDER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER E. B. COATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023mc00339
In Re:
Seroquel XR Antitrust Litigation
Petitioner:
Walgreen Co., Kroger Co., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC. and others
Respondent:
TruPharma LLC
Stacia Cullors et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 2:2022cv04263
Defendant:
Nurture, Inc., BEECH-NUT NUTRITION COMPANY, Nurture, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stacia Cullors, L. C., N. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal
B. v. CAPENELLA-CRUZ et al
as 1:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
E. B.
Defendant:
CAPENELLA-CRUZ, JOHN DOE, SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. et al v. BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
E. B., P. B. and R. B.
Defendant:
BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.B. v. HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM NEWARK AIRPORT et al
as 2:2021cv02901
Plaintiff:
E. B.
Defendant:
HOWARD JOHNSON BY WYNDHAM NEWARK AIRPORT, ROYAL MOTEL, MOTEL 6 CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ETIENNE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv15416
Plaintiff:
E. B. and GARY ETIENNE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B. et al v. Platinum PPO 250/0/15 Rx O et al
as 1:2020cv01935
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh E. B. and Reagan F. B.
Defendant:
Capital Blue Cross, Platinum PPO 250/0/15 Rx O, Magellan Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
