Cases 1 - 10 of 20
In Re: Harisadhan Patra and Petula Vaz, et al v. , et alIn re: In Re: Harisadhan Patra and Petula Vaz, et al v. , et al
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
In re: HARISADHAN PATRA and PETULA VAZ
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY, FRANK T. BROGAN, individually and in his official capacity as Chancellor and others
GONZALEZ v. PEOSH et al
as 3:2021cv18966
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
PEOSH, THOMAS LIPSKI and THOMAS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GONZALEZ v. EAST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv15113
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
EAST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP and JANICE S. MIRONOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Harisadhan Patra, et al v. Pennsylvania State System of H, et al
as 20-2320
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SOLTZ, individually and in his official capacity as President of Bloomsburg University, PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, IRA BLAKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARISADHAN PATRA and PETULA VAZ
Harisadhan Patra, et al v. Pennsylvania State System of H, et al
as 19-3065
Not Yet Classified:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, THOMAS R. ZALEWSKI, IRA BLAKE and others
GONZALEZ v. OLD NAVY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv15004
Defendant:
THE GAP, INC., OLD NAVY, LLC, OLD NAVY OF NORTH BERGEN and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HERNANDEZ v. MONTOYA et al
as 2:2016cv04592
Plaintiff:
ANGEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
E. MONTOYA, ESPOSITO, JUDEH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luz Gonzalez v. Commissioner Social Security
as 16-2470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUZ E. GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Gonzalez v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv02131
Plaintiff:
Luz E. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Caolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez v. Social Security
as 3:2015cv00875
Plaintiff:
Luz E. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
