Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
EAST COAST TRANSPORT, LLC v. JJS TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTION CO. et al
as 1:2022cv01123
Counter Defendant:
EAST COAST TRANSPORT, LLC
Cross Defendant:
JJS TRANSPORTATION & DISTRIBUTION CO.
Cross Claimant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HUMMEL v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. et al
as 5:2021cv01652
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-30, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HUMMEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv06085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ACOSTA v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
as 5:2017mc00179
Petitioner:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Respondent:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
