Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SMITH v. FRIONI et al
as 2:2021cv01800
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SMITH
Defendant:
WILLIAM FRIONI, CHRIS BELLOTTI and PATRICIA VALAURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv01969
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER
Petitioner:
FRANCIS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH et al V. CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY, ETAL
as 2:2020cv01958
Lead Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SMITH
Plaintiff:
FRANK GIORDANO, DANIEL CHRISTY, REVEREND HERBERT H. LUSK, II and others
Defendant:
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA and CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. WARDEN OF SCI FOREST et al
as 2:2019cv00837
Respondent:
JUDGE RANGOS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
FRANCIS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carl Smith v. Commissioner Social Security
as 16-4413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL FRANCIS SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Smith v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv01107
Plaintiff:
Carl Francis Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SMITH v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01685
Petitioner:
FRANCIS SMITH
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66008
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CARL SMITH and DOROTHY FRANCIS SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60282
Plaintiff:
HENRY SMITH and FRANCIS SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv86478
Plaintiff:
MELVIN E. SMITH and MARY FRANCIS SMITH
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORP., PFIZER, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
