Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States Of America v. Harkleroad et al
as 3:2017cv01364
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Ronald L. Harkleroad and Colleen M. Harkleroad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Marcus Walton v. Harkleroad, et al
as 17-1351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARKLEROAD, Correctional Officer
Nathan Riley v. Abubakar Muhammad, et al
as 16-2366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ABUBAKAR MUHAMMAD, ALEDA MENCHYK, FOOD SERVICE MANAGER WALLACE DITTSWORTH and others
Thurman Mearin v. Louis Folino, et al
as 16-1721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent, CARLA SWARTZ, Program Review Committee, GREG JOHNSON, Program Review Committee and others
HARKLEROAD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv00650
Plaintiff:
SANDRA KAY HARKLEROAD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
REID-DOUGLAS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS, THOMAS SCOTT and DALIYL MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNACLE , DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEARIN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, CARLA SWARTZ, ROBERT DIETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid-Douglas et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv01172
Plaintiff:
Steven Reid-Douglas, Thomas Scott and Daliyl Muhammad
Defendant:
John Wetzel, James Barnacle, David Pitkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY et al v. MUHAMMAD et al
as 2:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RILEY
Defendant:
ABUBAKAR MUHAMMAD, ALEDA MENCHYK, WALLACE DITTSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Muhammad et al
as 3:2013cv02766
Plaintiff:
Nathan Riley and Alejambra Tilley
Defendant:
Abubakar Muhammad, Aleda Menchyk, Wallace Dittsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
