Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ingram v. Delaware Superior Court et al
as 1:2026cv01042
Plaintiff:
LaChina Ingram
Defendant:
Delaware Superior Court, Monica Horton and Katelyn Will
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INGRAM v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2026cv04861
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY INGRAM
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
INGRAM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2026cv08632
Plaintiff:
KEYARA INGRAM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv02398
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
INGRAM v. PRAUL et al.
as 2:2026cv03486
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Defendant:
JOHN PRAUL, VICTOR HORNE, C. FREDERICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03440
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INGRAM v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2026cv00059
Petitioner:
JOSEPH INGRAM
Respondent:
WARDEN NEWMAN and FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
