Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv02398
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
INGRAM v. PRAUL et al.
as 2:2026cv03486
Plaintiff:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Defendant:
JOHN PRAUL, VICTOR HORNE, C. FREDERICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03440
Plaintiff:
ROGER INGRAM
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INGRAM v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2026cv00059
Petitioner:
JOSEPH INGRAM
Respondent:
WARDEN NEWMAN and FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALOI v. TEGRAEXCEL ENERGY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
TARA ALOI
Defendant:
TEGRAEXCEL ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, TEGRAEXCEL OILFIELD LOGISTICS, LLC and IKE INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
INGRAM v. VOTH et al
as 2:2026cv01612
Plaintiff:
ELIJA INGRAM
Defendant:
JOSHUA D. VOTH, HIGH TRANSIT, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ingram v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv00225
Plaintiff:
Ali S. Ingram
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
