Cases 1 - 10 of 379
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. MOTLEY RICE et al
as 1:2024cv02749
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
MOTLEY RICE, MOTLEY RICE LLC, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BUREAU OF STATISTICS, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
- TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-01672
as 3:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE TURNER
Defendant:
LEGAL BAY, MEGA LEADS, JAMES ALAMIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Patterson v. USA, et al
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Small Business / Self Employed Division and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
TOUSSAINT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
FRITZ GERALD TOUSSAINT
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Custer v. Jason Green, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH CUSTER
Defendant:
JASON GREEN, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, TIM REARDON, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, GEORGE SOLIS and others
Harvey ShortIn re: Harvey Short
as 23-3129
Petitioner:
In re: HARVEY PATRICK SHORT
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Roland Graham, et al v. IRS
as 23-3001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND GRAHAM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR SAEZ, CHARLES GREEN, Lieutenant, FERNANDO MIRAYE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
