Cases 1 - 10 of 710
JACKSON et al v. THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05431
Plaintiff:
IRENE JACKSON and WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant:
THE STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET CO., LLC, JOHN DOES 1-3 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-3 (fictitious names)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
THE ESTATE OF IRENE FIELDS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00844
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF IRENE FIELDS and RHONDA SAPP
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPAINES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
Perry v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Marcelo Perry
Defendant:
Abigail Irene Kelly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
