Cases 1 - 10 of 21
COX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12167
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
WANDA J. COX
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Vose et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company et al
as 3:2013cv04519
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Vose , James L. Addington , Harvey Allen, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARRINGTON v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
JOMAS ARRINGTON
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DELACRUZ, GEORGE TRILLHAUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARLEY et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH
as 2:2012cv01149
Plaintiff:
EDMUND J. FARLEY , ROBERT J. COX and HARRY J. SCHERER
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COX v. BOLGER et al
as 1:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. COX
Defendant:
ANN M. BOLGER, JOHN DOE, MARY DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv06081
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Plaintiff:
DIANA COX and GARY J. COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45111
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. COX JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
