Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stanley Summerville, et al v. Joseph Fuentes, et al
as 19-3240
Defendant / Appellee:
COLONEL JOSEPH RICK FUENTES, LIEUTENANT J. HARRISON, #5277, DETECTIVE SARGENT T. KELSHAW, #6231 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGEANT MICHAEL GREGORY, #6032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FOMBAH SIRLEAF and STANLEY SUMMERVILLE
PORTER v. CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02252
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN PORTER
Defendant:
CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. , MOHAMMED H. BUDEIR , TIMOTHY J. HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Warden of F.C.I. Schuylkill
as 4:2014cv00942
Petitioner:
Eric J. Harrison
Respondent:
Warden of F.C.I. Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HARRISON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HARRISON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRISON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75080
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HARRISON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv69618
Petitioner:
JUDSON J HARRISON
Defendant:
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRISON et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2008cv90793
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. HARRISON and SUE HARRISON
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARRISON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2007cv04174
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HARRISON
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
