Cases 1 - 10 of 21
KING v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Petitioner:
JAMES KING
Respondent:
KENNETH R. HOLLIBAUGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Brann et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
James King
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Brann, Court Administrator Janelle, Kyle Rude and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04038
Plaintiff:
MARY KING and JAMES KING
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Ty Albright, Patricia Allison, Damaris Andrea and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
KING v. MYLAN N.V. et al
as 1:2021cv15430
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
MYLAN N.V., MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. James King
as 16-3724
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES KING
King v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv00953
Petitioner:
James King
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Zickefoose et al
as 3:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
James King
Defendant:
Donna Zickefoose, Cory Heath, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. USA
as 3:2016cv00205
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
