Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jamieson et al v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Jamieson, John Gordon Jamieson, Sara Felicity Jamieson-Delgado and others
Defendant:
Lauren Eileen Brown, Indv. and in her capacity as Trustee of Barbara Armstrong Jamieson Family Trust and Lauren Eileen Bear Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
HE v. GAIN CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv05026
Defendant:
ALEX GOOR, CHRISTOPHER S. SUGDEN, PETER QUICK and others
Plaintiff:
YE HE
WRIGHT v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv00846
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOUGLAS WRIGHT
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MILLINER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv08116
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOUGLAS MILLINER, JR.
Defendant:
OWENS and CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANSOME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03142
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOUGLAS RANSOME
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: John Parker
as 16-2659
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN DOUGLAS PARKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BITTING v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2016cv00578
Petitioner:
JOHN DOUGLAS BITTING, IV
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bitting IV v. Kerestes
as 3:2016cv00172
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
John Douglas Bitting IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANSOME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv05972
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOUGLAS RANSOME
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
