Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Allen
Defendant:
John E. Jones, III, Robert D. Mariani, Karoline Mehalchick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
In re: Julio Aviles, Sr.
as 20-2124
Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JULIO AVILES, SR.
In re: Steven Buttolph
as 19-3631
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PERRY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN E JONES, III and others
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant:
THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
John E. Jones, Martin C. Carlson and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Steven Johnson
as 17-1436
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, WARDEN LEE USP and WARDEN BIG SANDY USP
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
In re: Steven Johnson
as 17-1437
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and WARDEN CANAAN USP
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
In re: Kai Ingram
as 17-1058
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant - Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, JACQUELINE M. CARROLL, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
Ott v. Commissioner's of Somerset County, PA et al
as 1:2016cv02534
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Ott
Defendant:
Commissioner's of Somerset County, PA, Occupants of Somerset County, PA, Publics of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Steven Johnson
as 16-4235
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: STEVEN A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Nominal Respondent:
JOHN E JONES, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
