Cases 1 - 10 of 22
PYATT v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02444
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN MARIO COLUCCI, WARDEN DAVID BYRNES, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL PYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Futch v. Fed Bur Prisons, et al
as 09-4478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant - Appellee:
FED BUR PRISONS
Defendant - Non-Participating:
J. MCKINNON and M. CENTERO, COUNSELOR
FUTCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv03173
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FUTCH v. PATEL et al
as 1:2009cv02981
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant:
PRADIP PATEL, VICENTE ELIAS, LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FUTCH v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv02530
Petitioner:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Respondent:
J. GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALTERS et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE et al
as 2:2009cv66707
Plaintiff:
JOHN RANDALL WALTERS, JOHN RANDALL WALTERS, JOHN RANDALL WALTERS and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE, CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ABESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP. ABESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP. ABESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In re: John Futch
as 09-1788
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Futch v. USA
as 09-1705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RANDALL FUTCH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
