Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James et al v. Respironics, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Connie Chaney James, Angela James Jenkins, Fiona James and others
Defendant:
RESPIRONICS INC., Lagniappe Medical Data and Sleep Apnea Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JENKINS v. USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2019cv05906
Defendant:
MRS. A. MARTINEZ, USAA FEDERAL SAVING BANK, JACQUELINE Y. ALEJANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv16125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KULHAWY v. JIM JENKINS LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv00384
Plaintiff:
LESLIE A. KULHAWY
Defendant:
JIM JENKINS LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER, JAMES JENKINS and LISA JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JENKINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAMES JENKINS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JENKINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59147
Plaintiff:
JAMES JENKINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Jenkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
