Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SEPTA v. Orrstown Financial Services In, et al
as 20-2829
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH F. SHOEMAKER, THOMAS R. QUINN, JR., ORRSTOWN BANK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
SEPTA v. Orrstown Financial Services In, et al
as 20-8030
Petitioner:
SMITH ELLIOTT KEARNS & CO, KENNETH F. SHOEMAKER, ORRSTOWN BANK and others
Respondent:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
KENNEDY v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv02778
Defendant:
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN and RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07070
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC v. BRAUNSTEIN et al
as 2:2019cv04334
Defendant:
PARADIGM WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC., LAURENCE BRAUNSTEIN and PARADIGM WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC
Plaintiff:
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC. and JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT, LLC v. SEIGERMAN
as 2:2017cv12932
Plaintiff:
JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID SEIGERMAN
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
